Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: Big power on built mark viii block?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177

    Question Big power on built mark viii block?

    Ok, I have a couple questions,

    so I've done a bunch of research and I'm hearing allot of contradicting information. I'm new to the modular game so bare with me. I'm planning on purchasing a Lincoln mark viii block and throwing some Forged rods/ pistons in it . Goal would be 700whp +

    From what I gather, the major plus is the teksid block. The cast crank doesn't seem like it would be up to my power goal task (am I wrong?) , so I was thinking a cobra crank would suffice.( Would that just be a drop in ordeal?)

    After machining the block, assembly, etc... Would our heads just bolt right on? Oil Galleys/ coolant passages all line up? / motor mount differences? Oil pan clearance issues? Transmission mounting issues?

    I'm probably forgetting some questions, but looking forward to hearing from you guys! Thanks!
    Last edited by minimarine09; 02-09-2017 at 04:00 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177
    I'm currently running a D1sc Procharger, if you are wondering

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Near Knoxville TN
    Age
    67
    Posts
    10,720
    Stock block and crank will be ok. Teksid will work also. Weaknesses are stock rods and pistons in both.
    I loved the power from the D1SC.
    Thanks to Darrin @ BC Automotive:
    $1800 and it was worse than when he started!

    Brian (FordNut) FPG # 1458 of 7838
    03 MM 300A (Lotsa mods, 130k mi) was 303rwhp/318rwtq N/A
    then 476/410 D1SC ProCharged on stock block
    then 660/555 D1SC PC on 5.3 wet sleeved Teksid alum big bore stroker
    then 365/369 N/A on 5.3 wet sleeved Teksid alum big bore stroker
    Now 751/617 3.4L Whipple on 5.3 Boss5.0 iron big bore stroker

    03 MM 300B Silver (Mostly stock, originally wife's car, 370k mi) FPG # 7053 of 7838 or 49 of 417 SB
    03 MM 300B Silver, Stock, wife's next one, 136k mi FPG # 7134 of 7838 or 89 of 417 SB
    04 MM Silver, Stock, on standby 85k mi, FPG # 1212 of 3214 or 432 of 997 SB
    01 F150 longbed
    01 F150 shortbed
    00 F150 4x4 stepside
    01 F150 4x4 7700
    68 Stang FB (70 351C 4V, 4 wheel discs, project car)

    Mods listed here (some items not current): FordNut's Mods

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by FordNut View Post
    Stock block and crank will be ok. Teksid will work also. Weaknesses are stock rods and pistons in both.
    I loved the power from the D1SC.
    Nice! My plans are to build a motor on the side, so might as well get a mark xiii short block. would everything be a straight up bolt on affair? (with my current heads, motor mounts, etc...) Or would I have to change anything? You don't think 700-800hp would be pushing it for the cast crank?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Moreau Island
    Posts
    12,209
    Good read about the blocks

    http://www.mre-books.com/sa82/sa82_1.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Near Knoxville TN
    Age
    67
    Posts
    10,720
    Quote Originally Posted by minimarine09 View Post
    Nice! My plans are to build a motor on the side, so might as well get a mark xiii short block. would everything be a straight up bolt on affair? (with my current heads, motor mounts, etc...) Or would I have to change anything? You don't think 700-800hp would be pushing it for the cast crank?
    There are minor differences. Knock sensor mounting, early vs late crank trigger ring, maybe the cam chain tensioners and pivot pins.

    I think a forged crank will have the 8 bolt flywheel so you would need to find a flex plate. If you can find a forged crank cheap it won't hurt anything, but the cast crank will be ok too.
    Thanks to Darrin @ BC Automotive:
    $1800 and it was worse than when he started!

    Brian (FordNut) FPG # 1458 of 7838
    03 MM 300A (Lotsa mods, 130k mi) was 303rwhp/318rwtq N/A
    then 476/410 D1SC ProCharged on stock block
    then 660/555 D1SC PC on 5.3 wet sleeved Teksid alum big bore stroker
    then 365/369 N/A on 5.3 wet sleeved Teksid alum big bore stroker
    Now 751/617 3.4L Whipple on 5.3 Boss5.0 iron big bore stroker

    03 MM 300B Silver (Mostly stock, originally wife's car, 370k mi) FPG # 7053 of 7838 or 49 of 417 SB
    03 MM 300B Silver, Stock, wife's next one, 136k mi FPG # 7134 of 7838 or 89 of 417 SB
    04 MM Silver, Stock, on standby 85k mi, FPG # 1212 of 3214 or 432 of 997 SB
    01 F150 longbed
    01 F150 shortbed
    00 F150 4x4 stepside
    01 F150 4x4 7700
    68 Stang FB (70 351C 4V, 4 wheel discs, project car)

    Mods listed here (some items not current): FordNut's Mods

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    4 miles from insanity and 2ft from broke!
    Posts
    9,559
    I would not attempt to push a cast crank past 600 at the wheels, 700 rwhp on a cast crank will be on borrowed time.
    04 MERCURY MARAUDER build date:02/11/04
    ITS ALIVE !!!!!!!!

    STAY TUNED!!!!!!!!!!

    **WHIPPLE 4.0L CRUSHER!**0000 (FOR NOW) RWHP

    VISIT MY GARAGE FOR A FULL LIST OF MODS

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by FordNut View Post
    There are minor differences. Knock sensor mounting, early vs late crank trigger ring, maybe the cam chain tensioners and pivot pins.

    I think a forged crank will have the 8 bolt flywheel so you would need to find a flex plate. If you can find a forged crank cheap it won't hurt anything, but the cast crank will be ok too.
    So besides the flywheel /flex plate, any connectors would be the same, no issues with crank position sensing since differences in the trigger plate?

    Quote Originally Posted by MOTOWN View Post
    I would not attempt to push a cast crank past 600 at the wheels, 700 rwhp on a cast crank will be on borrowed time.

    ^^^ that's what I mean, contradicting, I hear that the crank would be fine, then I hear that it may explode. Is there any proof to either side?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Rockford
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,227
    i understood the threshold for the OEM cast crank is @600 RWHP.
    I had the car down three years til I got it back together.
    all I can say is trust no one here !
    2004 Trilogy #93P 12.2@113 Built and stalled

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Rockford
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,227
    i understood the threshold for the OEM cast crank is @600 RWHP.
    I had the car down three years til I got it back together.
    all I can say is trust no one here !
    If I had it to do over , I could have bought brand new instead of dragging my ass all over to get misrepresented garbage.
    2004 Trilogy #93P 12.2@113 Built and stalled

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    932
    The biggest problem with a cast crank, in my opinion, is the flex on the snout you'll have with driving the supercharger. Even with the forged crank, some guys, like myself, will stay with the caged lower pulley. I'm not sure how the belt/belts run with a centri. I'm sure there are other weak points with a cast crank, but the flex on the crank snout is the one I read about the most from the cobra guys, when having crank failures, when going with a bigger roots style blower
    SEMPER FI From York, Pa

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177
    What about the heads? I was reading the b heads are better for boost while our heads ( c heads) are better for low end / mid range n/a. Any input on that?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    177
    Ok so block wise, I've pretty much made up my mind, I'll go with a teksid block, cobra crank, eagle rods, and around 10:1 Cp, diamond, Wiseco, ect. Pistons. With arp head and main studs I figure the bottom end will be bullet proof.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    237
    It will work fine. Skip the knock sensor its a waste of time. I obsessed over it for a short period, glad I didn't let it cost me any money. One of the motor mount locations will need some aluminum removed in order for one of the mounts to bolt on properly, I don't recall which side. You can use either the marauder crank gears and timing sensor sprocket, or the set from the mark8, you cannot mix them - you will see why when compared. Feel free to PM me if you need.
    2003 MM 300A #4271 [BURNOUTS ACROSS AMERICA car / RIP Paul Casey]
    fully built teksid motor done 3/1/16, too many mods to list...

    Visit my garage for details

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by minimarine09 View Post
    So besides the flywheel /flex plate, any connectors would be the same, no issues with crank position sensing since differences in the trigger plate?




    ^^^ that's what I mean, contradicting, I hear that the crank would be fine, then I hear that it may explode. Is there any proof to either side?
    put it like this.... I have a forged, 8 bolt crank in my NA marauder. So theres no reason why you shouldnt have one either.


    98 P71 SOLD

    2003 MARAUDER - BLACK ~ Race Car
    2003 MARAUDER - DARK BLUE PEARL ~ DD
    2002 Crown Vic Sport ~ top secret project car

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Power Stroke Diesel Owners,....
    By MM2004 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-14-2005, 09:01 PM
  2. Totally True Tidbits About Nuclear Power
    By dwasson in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-22-2005, 11:31 AM
  3. Big Block edition 460 in Panther
    By Geo in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 11:49 PM
  4. HOLY SMOKES....from Bradenton, Florida!!!
    By MI2QWK4U in forum Community Discussion
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 03-14-2004, 08:28 PM
  5. Big Block vs. Small Block
    By Ross in forum Community Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-04-2003, 12:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •