PDA

View Full Version : Sedans. A thing of the past?



Jtrip
04-20-2018, 05:02 PM
I know that the last type of car I look at for my family is a sedan. Although just as capable as an SUV, I guess a sedans trunk space doesn't really matter as much anymore.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2018/04/20/worst-selling-vehicles-models-americans-didnt-buy/526892002/

Invective
04-20-2018, 06:50 PM
I know that the last type of car I look at for my family is a sedan. Although just as capable as an SUV, I guess a sedans trunk space doesn't really matter as much anymore.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2018/04/20/worst-selling-vehicles-models-americans-didnt-buy/526892002/

I doubt it. Sadly, the Marauder and the current Fusion Sport are/were the best kept secrets of motordom....

BUCKWHEAT
04-21-2018, 08:46 AM
I doubt it. Sadly, the Marauder and the current Fusion Sport are/were the best kept secrets of motordom....
My wife just bought the 3.0 TT Mk-Z. It's pretty quick, particularly from 80 to 100.

Invective
04-21-2018, 09:37 AM
My wife just bought the 3.0 TT Mk-Z. It's pretty quick, particularly from 80 to 100.

Nice car. And to think the lowly Fusion Sport only has the 2.7L TT…

Mr. Man
04-21-2018, 12:28 PM
Answer is simple, trucks are roomier and generally easier to get in and out of. Americans are getting taller and fatter, but cars(sedans) don't reflect that. I remember "Big" Cadillac's not these munchkin things they make now. Same goes for Chevy and the rest of them. You want a big car you need big bucks to buy one, Mercedes, Bentley, Rolls.

Heck even the Marauder is a pain to get in and out of if your tall and/or fat. Pretty roomy once your in it though. Still needs more leg room for those over 6 feet.

Joe Walsh
04-21-2018, 01:07 PM
Nice car. And to think the lowly Fusion Sport only has the 2.7L TT…

lowly....?

Many a BMW douche ..... errrrr....... driver
has found my 'lowly' Fusion Sport "rental car" quite a bit more than they could handle!.....:D

https://i.imgur.com/0ksypN3l.jpg

2mercs
04-21-2018, 03:51 PM
Enjoy my Taurus SHO pretty quick for what it is. Comfortable ride, roomy, and has embarrassed a few performance cars. Ford is stopping production of this platform and the fusion so I've heard. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180421/9d4a781dcac087338d2892dbdc6129 4d.jpg

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Agent2006
04-21-2018, 05:12 PM
@2Mercs: nice SHO.

At 6-03 at 245 lbs,
I don't have enough shoulder room in a lot of cars. (Yeah my MM jacket is size 2XL and it barely fits.) It's why I like the MM, CV and the GM. Leg room is just OK but I can live with it. Other thing is: leg angle/seating position, trucks and SUV's give me hip problems. But a Ford panther I can drive 8 hrs straight.

Fuel economy: I could care less. 18 mpg is fine even at $3/gallon. So what.
Cargo space: I don't think 5 ft truck beds and most SUV's have much useful carrying space. I've hauled 600 lb of firewood, 10 bags of mulch, a washing machine and a few V-8 short blocks in my panthers. No problem!

Invective
04-21-2018, 08:13 PM
Enjoy my Taurus SHO pretty quick for what it is. Comfortable ride, roomy, and has embarrassed a few performance cars. Ford is stopping production of this platform and the fusion so I've heard. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180421/9d4a781dcac087338d2892dbdc6129 4d.jpg

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Would like to know how your car stacks up to the Fusion Sport….

2mercs
04-21-2018, 08:20 PM
Would like to know how your car stacks up to the Fusion Sport….From what I've seen stock for stock the SHO is quicker.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Invective
04-21-2018, 08:42 PM
From what I've seen stock for stock the SHO is quicker.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Good images from you and Joe Walsh. Still recalling how the 1988 3.8L (vs. the more common 3.0L) Taurus was being pushed at the local dealer as the ‘Future of Full Sized Cars’….truly incredible….

jerrym3
04-22-2018, 06:12 AM
Answer is simple, trucks are roomier and generally easier to get in and out of. Americans are getting taller and fatter, but cars(sedans) don't reflect that. I remember "Big" Cadillac's not these munchkin things they make now. Same goes for Chevy and the rest of them. You want a big car you need big bucks to buy one, Mercedes, Bentley, Rolls.

Heck even the Marauder is a pain to get in and out of if your tall and/or fat. Pretty roomy once your in it though. Still needs more leg room for those over 6 feet.

Try being 75 and getting in and out of a 2003 TBird with the top up. A real challenge, and I'm only 5'10" under 200 lbs.

Plenty of room once inside.

Joe Walsh
04-22-2018, 06:13 AM
Good images from you and Joe Walsh. Still recalling how the 1988 3.8L (vs. the more common 3.0L) Taurus was being pushed at the local dealer as the ‘Future of Full Sized Cars’….truly incredible….

Owned one of those too...1989 Taurus.
Funny thing you mentioned the engine choices.
I ordered/had my Taurus built because I specifically wanted the 'big' 3.8L V6.
When I came in to pick up my freshly delivered Taurus, I pop the hood and see '3.0L' on the valve covers....:mad:
Dealer salesman tells me that "they must've put the wrong valve covers on the engine"... :rolleyes: ....yeah....right.
Turns out they screwed up my order and I was stuck with that turd Vulcan 3.0. At least those boat anchor Vulcan engines last forever.
I put 247,000 miles on the Taurus before I grew tired of it and donated it to charity.
I surprised the truck driver who came to pick up my donated car, and drove it up onto the flatbed (it still ran fine except for every gasket dripping fluid)....lol

Bluerauder
04-22-2018, 06:20 AM
I have both a 2012 Taurus SHO and a 2003 Marauder. I like 'Em both. Room is just fine for me. No problems getting in or out.