Mad4Macs
02-16-2007, 11:32 PM
All over the automotive press, I see stories of how Daimler wants to sell off Chrysler. Now, I fully understand how one company can buy another one, but wasn't Chrysler once an independant company (rhetorical question), standing on its own? Why does it need outside ownership? And if Chrysler can't stand on its own, why should it be in business?
If it were proven that the US (and global) marketplace couldn't support Chrysler in its pre-buyout (and current) form, perhaps Chrysler could survive as a much smaller automaker than it currently is? Maybe a niche player? It isn't as if they aren't selling cars... as a matter of fact, they've seemingly excelled in areas that Ford and GM walked away from, proving that there's a demand for front engine, rear drive cars with Big American V8 engines.
So... why couldn't Chrysler become a large volume "specialty car" maker, kicking out Vipers, Chargers, Challengers, 300's, Jeeps and such, instead of being in a position where everyone thinks that "what they need is a new owner", when not even Daimler can sustain the company in its current form?
I ask, because if a company with as much resources as Daimler has, can't keep Chrysler afloat "as is", then Chrysler, as a company, was dead before they were purchased, maybe even as far back as the day our government bailed them out. I don't want to see Chrysler go away, but in the world today, I don't see them as a global player, or even a company that could place a car in everyone's garage.
Anyways...
It makes my brain hurt :D
If it were proven that the US (and global) marketplace couldn't support Chrysler in its pre-buyout (and current) form, perhaps Chrysler could survive as a much smaller automaker than it currently is? Maybe a niche player? It isn't as if they aren't selling cars... as a matter of fact, they've seemingly excelled in areas that Ford and GM walked away from, proving that there's a demand for front engine, rear drive cars with Big American V8 engines.
So... why couldn't Chrysler become a large volume "specialty car" maker, kicking out Vipers, Chargers, Challengers, 300's, Jeeps and such, instead of being in a position where everyone thinks that "what they need is a new owner", when not even Daimler can sustain the company in its current form?
I ask, because if a company with as much resources as Daimler has, can't keep Chrysler afloat "as is", then Chrysler, as a company, was dead before they were purchased, maybe even as far back as the day our government bailed them out. I don't want to see Chrysler go away, but in the world today, I don't see them as a global player, or even a company that could place a car in everyone's garage.
Anyways...
It makes my brain hurt :D