PDA

View Full Version : A question for you CVPI guys



Petrograde
09-06-2003, 07:06 AM
Just out of curiosity, how much HP does the PI have? Thanks

Marauderer
09-06-2003, 07:14 AM
I found this last night through one of the members here I think.

Year CVPI/HPP/LX Sport Base CV/GM Town Car Cartier Marauder
1998 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs 200 hp, 275 ft-lbs 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs N/A
1999 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs 200 hp, 275 ft-lbs 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs N/A
2000 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs 200 hp, 275 ft-lbs 215 hp, 290 ft-lbs N/A
2001* 225 hp, 286 ft-lbs 220 hp, 265 ft-lbs 240 hp, 280 ft-lbs N/A
2002 235 hp, 275 ft-lbs 220 hp, 265 ft-lbs 235 hp, 275 ft-lbs N/A
2003** 239 hp, 287 ft-lbs 224 hp, 272 ft-lbs 239 hp, 287 ft-lbs 302 hp, 318 ft-lbs
2004 239 hp, 276 ft-lbs 224 hp, 265 ft-lbs 239 hp, 287 ft-lbs 302 hp, 318 ft-lbs

Here is the link for a better view:

http://www.redpulsar.us/~coldfusion/CrownVic.html

RCSignals
09-06-2003, 03:22 PM
It's incorrect for the 2004 CVPI should be 250 hp 287 lb-ft

also incorrect for:

2001 CVPI which should be 235 hp 275 ft-lb

2000 CVPI 200 hp 275 ft-lb

1999 CVPI 215hp 285 ft-lb

1998 215 hp 275 ft-lb

1997 210 hp 275 ft-lb

All above is taken from Ford Order guides for the Police Interceptor

metroplex
09-07-2003, 09:21 AM
For the sake of consistency I'll change it.

For the official record: Ford "Revises" their engine specs from time to time and its impossible to keep track of them all.

When I bought my 2000 HPP it had 285 ft-lb of torque. I don't get how it lost 10 ft-lbs over the years :confused:

And also note that Ford always overates the engine hp on these cars. A 2000 CVPI (stock) dynos about 187 hp at the crank (after conversion), not the advertised 215 hp.

metroplex
09-07-2003, 10:07 AM
Its interesting to note that with RCSignals's specs, the 2000 CVPI has the same hp as the base 2000 Vic w/o the HPP (single exhaust) 200 hp and 275 ft-lb of torque.

Goes to show you Ford is seriously whacked out when it comes to tuning these motors.

RCSignals
09-07-2003, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by metroplex
Its interesting to note that with RCSignals's specs, the 2000 CVPI has the same hp as the base 2000 Vic w/o the HPP (single exhaust) 200 hp and 275 ft-lb of torque.



Yes, I was surprised it wasn't listed as 215hp. The torque seems correct for a 2000

RCSignals
09-07-2003, 04:54 PM
Originally posted by metroplex

And also note that Ford always overates the engine hp on these cars. A 2000 CVPI (stock) dynos about 187 hp at the crank (after conversion), not the advertised 215 hp.

No Metro, if they did they'd be in big trouble.

You are the only person who always insists on that, using your own "conversion".

Petrograde
09-07-2003, 04:55 PM
OK,.. so our MMs are faster than cop cars. :D

RCSignals
09-07-2003, 05:23 PM
That would be correct Petrograde

Also, for interest sake, the 2000 CV order guide shows the HPP package as having 215 hp and 275 ft-lb.
The standard CV shows 200 hp and 275 ft-lbs.

I'd think the 2000 CVPI should also be 215 hp vice 200. Basically the HP increase in the HPP version is because of the dual exhaust

I can't find any literature from 2000 showing the CV with 285 ft-lbs

thedarkside
09-08-2003, 02:11 AM
OK,.. so our MMs are faster than cop cars.

BUT can you outrun or outsmart the radio is the big question???

Even my neon is faster than the times michigan got for the latest crop of cop cars (CV, FWD wimpala, Intrepid, yukon)

metroplex
09-11-2003, 06:58 AM
No Metro, if they did they'd be in big trouble.

You are the only person who always insists on that, using your own "conversion".

you mean the same conversion Jerry and A-train use?
:D

If 98-00 Vics really did have 215 hp at the crank FROM THE FACTORY they'd be running mid to high 15s BONE STOCK. But they're not. :)

Stock 00 CVPIs are running 16.2 to 16.5 on the 1/4.

metroplex
09-11-2003, 07:01 AM
Originally posted by Petrograde
OK,.. so our MMs are faster than cop cars. :D

Yep, CVPIs are the slowest panthers of the bunch next to single exhaust Vics.

The MMs are much better than the cheaped out CVPIs - nice leather seats, floor shifter, cool new wheels, and foglights!!!!!!!

SergntMac
09-11-2003, 05:44 PM
The right MM can scoot well ahead of any CV/PI...Well before anyone can repeat route and speed on any radio.

Drive short, turn often, and put as much distance as you can beween bumpers, and you will beat every radio...IMHO.

derek77
09-12-2003, 06:45 AM
Originally posted by RCSignals
It's incorrect for the 2004 CVPI should be 250 hp 287 lb-ft

also incorrect for:

2001 CVPI which should be 235 hp 275 ft-lb

2000 CVPI 200 hp 275 ft-lb

1999 CVPI 215hp 285 ft-lb

1998 215 hp 275 ft-lb

1997 210 hp 275 ft-lb

All above is taken from Ford Order guides for the Police Interceptor

Ford says 239hp for 2004 CVPI.

http://www.fleet.ford.com/products/fleet_showroom/2004fleetshowroom/2004-cvicpolice.asp

RF Overlord
09-12-2003, 07:21 AM
No offence to anyone, but isn't this a "CVN" argument?

RCSignals
09-12-2003, 01:40 PM
Originally posted by derek77
Ford says 239hp for 2004 CVPI.

http://www.fleet.ford.com/products/fleet_showroom/2004fleetshowroom/2004-cvicpolice.asp

Simple, the fleet page is wrong. Look up the Order Guide

metroplex
10-11-2003, 09:25 PM
http://www.85merk.com/members/metroplex/04CVPI.jpg

FYI I have one on order for a special project I'm doing (it involves an AED kit)

RCSignals
10-11-2003, 10:31 PM
Thanks for posting that metro.

metroplex
10-12-2003, 05:36 AM
you're welcome

Rider90
10-12-2003, 08:44 AM
Of all things I should really know the answer to this...

but what made the HP increase from 99 to 04 besides PI heads?

Marsha
10-12-2003, 04:56 PM
Hey Petrograde,

When I went in for my first oil change a State Trooper came up to me and asked "Did you know your MM is faster than our CV's", "YUP", I said. His response was "but we know where you live"! Ha Ha!
Marsha

Petrograde
10-12-2003, 06:04 PM
:lol: Marsha!

too bad he's right!

RCSignals
10-12-2003, 10:10 PM
rider, in that time I think there were exhaust system changes, some EEC tuning changes, addition of a knock sensor, and for 2004, a new airbox/MAF

Rider90
10-13-2003, 06:20 AM
Hmmm in 2004 didn't they change the torque converter for the P71?

RCSignals
10-13-2003, 09:24 PM
They may be using a new torque converter for 2004, but I haven't read anything about it.