PDA

View Full Version : trilogy eaton vs cobra eaton


ImpalaSlayer
09-30-2009, 07:32 PM
looking at pictures of the trilogy eaton and then looking at my cobra eaton, it appears the rotors (is that what there called?) on the trilogy are much longer then the cobras. does anyone know the air flow of either? just curious.
O's Fan Rich
09-30-2009, 07:33 PM
Dave, ask Brian Posi this question.
He's ported a couple of Trilogy's and Eatons..... he may know.

Modular fords......
ImpalaSlayer
09-30-2009, 07:36 PM
Dave, ask Brian Posi this question.
He's ported a couple of Trilogy's and Eatons..... he may know.

Modular fords......

gotcha. is that his user name?
O's Fan Rich
09-30-2009, 07:48 PM
POSI...... that's him!
DOOM
09-30-2009, 08:15 PM
Trilogy flows 600% more air. :D
RR|Suki
09-30-2009, 08:21 PM
Maybe it's an optical effect, I thought they were both M112 or whatever the name is...
Sully008
10-01-2009, 07:47 AM
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the Trilogy kit uses the Magnuson MP112 roots supercharger.

http://www.magnusonproducts.com/mp112.htm

vs. the Eaton:

http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/ProductsServices/PerformanceProducts/Products/Superchargers/M112/index.htm
offroadkarter
10-01-2009, 10:52 AM
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the Trilogy kit uses the Magnuson MP112 roots supercharger.

http://www.magnusonproducts.com/mp112.htm

vs. the Eaton:

http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/ProductsServices/PerformanceProducts/Products/Superchargers/M112/index.htm


you are correct... Essentially they are the same, but yet again they are different

the trilogy unit is a magnuson unit with a trilogy engraving ontop
ctrlraven
10-01-2009, 10:59 AM
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the Trilogy kit uses the Magnuson MP112 roots supercharger.

http://www.magnusonproducts.com/mp112.htm

vs. the Eaton:

http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/ProductsServices/PerformanceProducts/Products/Superchargers/M112/index.htm
Yep that is correct. Eaton has a direct relationship with automakers for power adders.
mpearce
10-01-2009, 01:36 PM
I believe the Trilogy Supercharger is a 1.9L

I could be wrong...it's been known to happen. :D
offroadkarter
10-01-2009, 01:54 PM
I believe the Trilogy Supercharger is a 1.9L

I could be wrong...it's been known to happen. :D


1.12 hence "112"
Blown3.8
10-01-2009, 01:58 PM
The rotors are same just the case is different. The trilogy/magnusen has a long thin discharge port. The cobra has more of a triangular port.
ImpalaSlayer
10-01-2009, 02:16 PM
The rotors are same just the case is different. The trilogy/magnusen has a long thin discharge port. The cobra has more of a triangular port.
thanks Chris. must have just been seeing things. 1.12L? damn thats tiny
RR|Suki
10-01-2009, 02:24 PM
thanks Chris. must have just been seeing things. 1.12L? damn thats tiny

That's what she said :lol:
ImpalaSlayer
10-01-2009, 02:26 PM
That's what she said :lol:
nice one! lol
offroadkarter
10-01-2009, 04:30 PM
thanks Chris. must have just been seeing things. 1.12L? damn thats tiny


its only .68 off fro your typical honda 4 banger :D


Kenne bell is coming out with a 3.6L twin screw, almost as big as our motors :lol:
ImpalaSlayer
10-01-2009, 04:31 PM
!do want!!
MM_BKK
10-01-2009, 09:26 PM
1.12 hence "112"

Wrong.

112 = 112 c.i. = 1835.35 c.c. = 1.835L
gmtech
10-02-2009, 04:51 AM
Wrong.

112 = 112 c.i. = 1835.35 c.c. = 1.835L
ding-ding we have a winner:D
mpearce
10-02-2009, 09:34 AM
Wrong.

112 = 112 c.i. = 1835.35 c.c. = 1.835L

This is what I believe also. I sent Jerry Barnes a PM back when I first bought mine in April. Because of the Kenne Bell's always advertising their supercharger sizes with "3.4L" etc, I was curious for myself. Jerry said he would ask his engineers...and he got back to me with 1.9L IIRC.

Of course, now I can't find them PM...but this math above seems correct.

-Mat
RR|Suki
10-02-2009, 10:34 AM
Wrong.

112 = 112 c.i. = 1835.35 c.c. = 1.835L

wait you mean he's stating something completely wrong... man who'd of thought
ImpalaSlayer
10-02-2009, 03:34 PM
ok that makes more sence. 1.2 seemed aufly small
O's Fan Rich
10-02-2009, 05:41 PM
sense...... sense....... sense.....