PDA

View Full Version : 2011 Mustang GT dynos 395 RWHP!!!



ctrlraven
03-25-2010, 07:20 AM
http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2010/03/inside-line-dyno-tests-the-2011-ford-mustang-gt-50.html



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf3BzvEximI
rf3BzvEximI

Oh boy. Friends, what we have here in the 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 is something that's sure to add a big ol' shovelful of coal under the pressure cooker that is the Camaro/Mustang rivalry.



You see, the Mustang GT's newfangled all-aluminum DOHC 5.0-liter V8...it makes some power. A lot of power, actually.


Ford claims it churns out 412 horsepower and 390 pound-feet of torque. While these numbers by themselves don't better those of the Camaro SS, on paper the Mustang's leaner curb weight might be able to put them to better use. Wait a week and we'll tell you all about our driving impressions of the 2011 Mustang.



In the meantime, while other outlets busied themselves doing burnouts, we were putting Ford's claims of power and torque to the test. Yes, for you, the loyal IL reader, we dyno-tested the 2011 Mustang GT.


http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/assets_c/2010/03/dyno_r34_1600-thumb-717x477.jpg


What the Mustang's 5.0-liter V8 lacks in displacement relative to its crosstown rival, it makes up for in its more capable valvetrain. Overhead cams are nothing new to Mustangs. Independent phasing of the intake and exhaust cams is. This capability allows the engine to breathe better over more of its rev range while improving fuel economy and reducing emissions.


We were only interested in the power part of the new five-oh, though. And here's what the Dynojet divulged:
http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/assets_c/2010/03/mustang_dyno-thumb-717x477.jpg


It took several pulls on the dyno to achieve a stabilized result. Each run eked out more power as the ECU probed the limits of the 91-octane fuel. The Mustang finally produced stable and repeatable numbers upon the 7th dyno pull.


With 250 lb-ft on tap at 2,000 rpm, torque starts out pretty strong. It then builds linearly and remains above 350 lb-ft from 4,150 to 5,500 rpm before tapering gently to the 6,850-rpm fuel cut.



Peak numbers are 365 lb-ft of torque at 4,350 rpm and 395 hp at 6,600 rpm. All of these at-the-wheels figures were obtained in 4th gear on a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno and include a 3% SAE weather correction factor.


http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/assets_c/2010/03/dyno_eng3_1600-thumb-717x477.jpg


Driveline loss for a solid axle-equipped car like the Mustang is typically 11-13%. This is a bit less than the usual 15-18% you'd expect on an IRS car, as solid axles have fewer power-sapping U-joints in their driveline. Hence, we should expect to see about 358-367 rwhp from this car.


Clearly, the 395 rwhp figure we measured is of particular interest since it implies one of two things -- either Ford is being conservative with its 412-hp flywheel rating, or the preproduction example we tested is unusually healthy. We're leaning toward the former, but we won't know for sure until we test a production 2011 Mustang.


One thing's for certain -- the reprise of the Mustang 5.0 is shaping up to be a strong pony.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5wVmAzKPC8
R5wVmAzKPC8


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1cJ0PSqXaI
W1cJ0PSqXaI


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_pQ1wH8NeU
U_pQ1wH8NeU

Zack
03-25-2010, 07:29 AM
Do want....but my Cobra will suffice for now :D

Pops
03-25-2010, 07:36 AM
They do not have good rods and pistons just like the Marauder!

Zack
03-25-2010, 07:40 AM
They do not have good rods and pistons just like the Marauder!

Actually you are kinda wrong.

I have to look up the specs on the rods, I know for a fact they are much stronger than Marauder rod.

ctrlraven
03-25-2010, 08:27 AM
They could be better but they are better then the Marauder's.

I bet it could easily do over 500rwhp on the stock internals.

musclemerc
03-25-2010, 08:55 AM
What a Monster!

Hadamustang1
03-25-2010, 09:07 AM
Wish they would put that set up in a sedan.. the doors or six feet long on that sucker..Howabout a four door falcon..

Zack
03-25-2010, 10:00 AM
Copied directly from 5.0 Magazine:

The Coyote team says the forged. powdered-metal connecting rod is the least robust link in the 5.0 chain. Engineers noted it is absolutely strong enough for its naturally aspirated application in the Mustang, but just absolutely strong enough. It's worth noting that while the Coyote rod shares its big- and small-end diameters plus its center-to-center length with the 4.6 rod, the Coyote rod has been redesigned to more evenly distribute bearing loads and is definitely an improved piece.



Basically it has a forged Powdered Metal connecting Rods, just like an LSx series engine.
Lets not forget LSx engines make 600-700rwhp on the same style rod and never have issues.

dohc324ci
03-25-2010, 10:00 AM
That's awesome!!!

2,4shofast
03-25-2010, 11:35 AM
Damn those are some nice numbers!

LeoVampire
03-25-2010, 12:23 PM
You will always have to second guess running against the new GT Mustangs with those motors and drivetrains.

But definatly something interesting to own if you can afford one that is LOL!!

ctrlraven
03-25-2010, 12:32 PM
I would love to see what it really puts out at the flywheel.

MrBluGruv
03-25-2010, 12:35 PM
Lol, it really is like the 60's all over again. :)

Joe Walsh
03-25-2010, 12:50 PM
Lol, it really is like the 60's all over again. :)

I was thinking the same thing....428CJ rated at 335 HP.....uhmmmm....yeah!........ :rolleyes:

Hey, I think that it is great that FORD under-rates* the actual HP!
I'd rather have the competition think that my rated 412 HP = @ 360 RWHP
Then you give them the :eek: with almost 400 RWHP!


*Remember the 1999 N/A Mustang Cobra debacle with its' 320 HP rating?

ctrlraven
03-25-2010, 12:58 PM
I was thinking the same thing....428CJ rated at 335 HP.....uhmmmm....yeah!........ :rolleyes:

Hey, I think that it is great that FORD under-rates* the actual HP!
I'd rather have the competition think that my rated 412 HP = @ 360 RWHP
Then you give them the :eek: with almost 400 RWHP!


*Remember the 1999 N/A Mustang Cobra debacle with its' 320 HP rating?
'99-'04 GT: 275 HP (260 advertised)
'01 Cobra: 330 HP (320 advertised)
'03/'04 Mach 1: 345 HP (305-'03, 310-'04 advertised)
'03/'04 Cobra: 430 HP (390 advertised)
'05+ GT: 335 HP (300 advertised)

The '99 Cobras advertised 320 hp and made about 305 (255 rwhp).