PDA

View Full Version : SOPA/PIPA - Join the petition Now



ctrlraven
01-18-2012, 09:20 AM
Help us all out and sign:

http://sopastrike.com/strike

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CongressLookup

Don't know, well now you know!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more


Why is Wikipedia blacked-out? Wikipedia is protesting against SOPA and PIPA by blacking out the English Wikipedia for 24 hours, beginning at midnight January 18, Eastern Time. Readers who come to English Wikipedia during the blackout will not be able to read the encyclopedia. Instead, you will see messages intended to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA, encouraging you to share your views with your representatives, and with each other on social media. What are SOPA and PIPA? SOPA and PIPA represent two bills in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate respectively. SOPA is short for the "Stop Online Piracy Act," and PIPA is an acronym for the "Protect IP Act." ("IP" stands for "intellectual property.") In short, these bills are efforts to stop copyright infringement committed by foreign web sites, but, in our opinion, they do so in a way that actually infringes free expression while harming the Internet. Detailed information about these bills can be found in the Stop Online Piracy Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act) and PROTECT IP Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act) articles on Wikipedia, which are available during the blackout. GovTrack lets you follow both bills through the legislative process: SOPA on this page (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3261), and PIPA on this one (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-968). The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for the public interest in the digital realm, has summarized why these bills are simply unacceptable (https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/how-pipa-and-sopa-violate-white-house-principles-supporting-free-speech) in a world that values an open, secure, and free Internet. Why is the blackout happening? Wikipedians have chosen to black out the English Wikipedia for the first time ever, because we are concerned that SOPA and PIPA will severely inhibit people's access to online information. This is not a problem that will solely affect people in the United States: it will affect everyone around the world. Why? SOPA and PIPA are badly drafted legislation that won't be effective at their stated goal (to stop copyright infringement), and will cause serious damage to the free and open Internet. They put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. And, SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. Does this mean that Wikipedia itself is violating copyright laws, or hosting pirated content? No, not at all. Some supporters of SOPA and PIPA characterize everyone who opposes them as cavalier about copyright, but that is not accurate. Wikipedians are knowledgeable about copyright and vigilant in protecting against violations: Wikipedians spend thousands of hours every week reviewing and removing infringing content. We are careful about it because our mission is to share knowledge freely. To that end, all Wikipedians release their contributions under a free license, and all the material we offer is freely licensed. Free licenses are incompatible with copyright infringement, and so infringement is not tolerated. Isn't SOPA dead? Wasn't the bill shelved, and didn't the White House declare that it won't sign anything that resembles the current bill? No, neither SOPA nor PIPA is dead. On January 17th, SOPA's sponsor said the bill will be discussed in early February. There are signs PIPA may be debated on the Senate floor next week. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. In many jurisdictions around the world, we're seeing the development of legislation that prioritizes overly-broad copyright enforcement laws, laws promoted by power players, over the preservation of individual civil liberties. How could SOPA and PIPA hurt Wikipedia? SOPA and PIPA are a threat to Wikipedia in many ways. For example, in its current form, SOPA would require Wikipedia to actively monitor every site we link to, to ensure it doesn't host infringing content. Any link to an infringing site could put us in jeopardy of being forced offline. I live in the United States. What's the best way for me to help? The most effective action you can take is to call your representatives and tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. Type your zipcode in the locator box to find your representatives' contact information (https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml). Text-based communication is okay, but phone calls have the most impact. I don't live in the United States. How can I help? Contact your local State Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, or similar branch of government. Tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. SOPA and PIPA will affect sites outside of the United States, and actions to sites inside the United States (like Wikipedia) will also affect non-American readers -- like you. Calling your own government will also let them know you don't want them to create their own bad anti-Internet legislation. Is it still possible to access Wikipedia in any way? Yes. During the blackout, Wikipedia is accessible on mobile devices and smart phones. You can also view Wikipedia normally by disabling JavaScript in your browser, as explained on this Technical FAQ page (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/English_Wikipedia_SOPA_blackou t/Technical_FAQ%20). Our purpose here isn't to make it completely impossible for people to read Wikipedia, and it's okay for you to circumvent the blackout. We just want to make sure you see our message. I keep hearing that this is a fight between Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Is that true? No. Some people are characterizing it that way, probably in an effort to imply all the participants are motivated by commercial self-interest. But it's obviously not that simple. The proof of that is Wikipedia's involvement. Wikipedia has no financial self-interest at play here: we do not benefit from copyright infringement, nor are we trying to monetize traffic or sell ads. We are protesting to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA solely because we think they will hurt the Internet, and your ability to access information online. We are doing this for you, because we're on your side. In carrying out this protest, is Wikipedia abandoning neutrality? We hope you continue to trust Wikipedia to be a neutral information source. We are staging this blackout because (as Wikimedia Foundation Trustee Kat Walsh said recently), although Wikipedia’s articles are neutral, its existence is not. For over a decade, Wikipedians have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Wikipedia is a tremendously useful resource, and its existence depends upon a free, open and uncensored Internet. SOPA and PIPA (and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States) will hurt you, because they will make it impossible for sites you enjoy, and benefit from, to continue to exist. That's why we're doing this. I have a question that isn't answered here, or, I would like to send feedback to Wikipedia. You can reach Wikipedia editors at info-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org. If you need a response, please be patient: we may have trouble keeping up with the mail.

RocsMerc
01-18-2012, 01:05 PM
I already signed the petition a few weeks ago and I signed another one today. I actually kind of expected this to get more attention on this forum than it is getting. If this bill passes forums like this one won't last very long! Mary be required to either police every link to an external site or more likely, for logistical reasons, simply block all external links and pictures in every post. This is because under this legislation any non dot com site, and all advertising partners of that site, that links to something that may have copyrighted material is just as guilty and can be shut down directly by the copyright holder without even going to court first. Only after being closed down and having all USA based forms of revenue disabled, then you take it to court to contest it. You may think "No big deal, I'm against piracy anyway so I'll just stick to the laws." Remember these videos?
11,052 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KF5_EV1xImY)
The Ultimate Marauder Video!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3N1LdSLiww)
For the longest time both these videos had the audio muted for having Warner Music Group copyrighted music in the background. Do you know why there not muted any more? It's because they were wrongly accused. There's a US law called "fair use" which allows for the use of copyrighted material in these instances. Lets say that this bill was law when WMG sent out the complaints about these two videos. I guarantee there was a link somewhere on this forum to those videos when they got their audio muted. On sites like YouTube, it's trivial to look up what sites your viewership's web traffic came from. As a dot com, YouTube would be protected from being shutdown directly, although they would still be taken to court. I don't see a .com in our web address, we're a dot net. Under this legislation, since we're not a .com, we're considered a foreign web site. It doesn't matter that we're hosted on US servers. Weather or not a site is domestic or foreign is decided entirely on what dot extension your site uses. And since we linked to a video with copyrighted music in it, we're now a foreign website that supports piracy and can be shutdown without due process. It wouldn't matter that WMG wrongly accused someone who posted a video that is not directly connected to this site. MM.net would be gone! This is a censorship system that would be ripe for abuse by any of the big media companies.

Here's a video that explains it perfectly.
http://vimeo.com/31100268

RocsMerc
01-18-2012, 05:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzqMoOk9NWc

Here's another good video I found about the topic citing the bill word for word to prove that this isn't just tinfoil hat stuff.

ImpalaSlayer
01-18-2012, 05:46 PM
this is unreal man